Moose::Cookbook::Recipe4 - Subtypes, and modeling a simple B<Company> class hierarchy |
Moose::Cookbook::Recipe4 - Subtypes, and modeling a simple Company class hierarchy
package Address; use Moose; use Moose::Util::TypeConstraints;
use Locale::US; use Regexp::Common 'zip';
my $STATES = Locale::US->new;
subtype USState => as Str => where { (exists $STATES->{code2state}{uc($_)} || exists $STATES->{state2code}{uc($_)}) };
subtype USZipCode => as Value => where { /^$RE{zip}{US}{-extended => 'allow'}$/ };
has 'street' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Str'); has 'city' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Str'); has 'state' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'USState'); has 'zip_code' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'USZipCode');
package Company; use Moose; use Moose::Util::TypeConstraints;
has 'name' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Str', required => 1); has 'address' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Address'); has 'employees' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'ArrayRef[Employee]');
sub BUILD { my ($self, $params) = @_; if ($params->{employees}) { foreach my $employee (@{$params->{employees}}) { $employee->company($self); } } }
after 'employees' => sub { my ($self, $employees) = @_; if (defined $employees) { foreach my $employee (@{$employees}) { $employee->company($self); } } };
package Person; use Moose;
has 'first_name' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Str', required => 1); has 'last_name' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Str', required => 1); has 'middle_initial' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Str', predicate => 'has_middle_initial'); has 'address' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Address');
sub full_name { my $self = shift; return $self->first_name . ($self->has_middle_initial ? ' ' . $self->middle_initial . '. ' : ' ') . $self->last_name; }
package Employee; use Moose;
extends 'Person';
has 'title' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Str', required => 1); has 'company' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Company', weak_ref => 1);
override 'full_name' => sub { my $self = shift; super() . ', ' . $self->title };
In this recipe we introduce the subtype
keyword, and show
how it can be useful for specifying type constraints
without building an entire class to represent them. We
will also show how this feature can be used to leverage the
usefulness of CPAN modules. In addition to this, we will
introduce another attribute option.
Let's first look at the subtype
feature. In the Address class we have
defined two subtypes. The first subtype
uses the the Locale::US manpage module, which
provides two hashes which can be used to perform existential checks for state
names and their two letter state codes. It is a very simple and very useful
module, and perfect for use in a subtype
constraint.
my $STATES = Locale::US->new; subtype USState => as Str => where { (exists $STATES->{code2state}{uc($_)} || exists $STATES->{state2code}{uc($_)}) };
Because we know that states will be passed to us as strings, we
can make USState
a subtype of the built-in type constraint
Str
. This will ensure that anything which is a USState
will
also pass as a Str
. Next, we create a constraint specializer
using the where
keyword. The value being checked against in
the where
clause can be found in the $_
variable (1). Our
constraint specializer will then check whether the given string
is either a state name or a state code. If the string meets this
criteria, then the constraint will pass, otherwise it will fail.
We can now use this as we would any built-in constraint, like so:
has 'state' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'USState');
The state
accessor will now check all values against the
USState
constraint, thereby only allowing valid state names or
state codes to be stored in the state
slot.
The next subtype
does pretty much the same thing using the the Regexp::Common manpage
module, and is used as the constraint for the zip_code
slot.
subtype USZipCode => as Value => where { /^$RE{zip}{US}{-extended => 'allow'}$/ };
Using subtypes can save a lot of unnecessary abstraction by not requiring you to
create many small classes for these relatively simple values. They also allow
you to reuse the same constraints in a number of classes (thereby avoiding
duplication), since all type constraints are stored in a global registry and
always accessible to has
.
With these two subtypes and some attributes, we have defined
as much as we need for a basic Address class. Next, we define
a basic Company class, which itself has an address. As we saw in
earlier recipes, we can use the Address
type constraint that
Moose automatically created for us:
has 'address' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Address');
A company also needs a name, so we define that as well:
has 'name' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'Str', required => 1);
Here we introduce another attribute option, the required
option.
This option tells Moose that name
is a required parameter in
the Company constructor, and that the name
accessor cannot
accept an undefined value for the slot. The result is that name
will always have a value.
The next attribute option is not actually new, but a new variant of options we have already introduced:
has 'employees' => (is => 'rw', isa => 'ArrayRef[Employee]');
Here, we are passing a more complex string to the isa
option, we
are passing a container type constraint. Container type constraints
can either be ArrayRef
or HashRef
with a contained type given
inside the square brackets. This basically checks that all the values
in the ARRAY ref are instances of the Employee class.
This will ensure that our employees will all be of the correct type. However,
the Employee object (which we will see in a moment) also maintains a
reference to its associated Company. In order to maintain this relationship
(and preserve the referential integrity of our objects), we need to perform some
processing of the employees over and above that of the type constraint check.
This is accomplished in two places. First we need to be sure that any employees
array passed to the constructor is properly initialized. For this we can use the
BUILD
method (2):
sub BUILD { my ($self, $params) = @_; if ($params->{employees}) { foreach my $employee (@{$params->{employees}}) { $employee->company($self); } } }
The BUILD
method will be executed after the initial type constraint
check, so we can simply perform a basic existential check on the employees
param here, and assume that if it does exist, it is both an ARRAY ref
and contains only instances of Employee.
The next aspect we need to address is the employees
read/write
accessor (see the employees
attribute declaration above). This
accessor will correctly check the type constraint, but we need to extend it
with some additional processing. For this we use an after
method modifier,
like so:
after 'employees' => sub { my ($self, $employees) = @_; if (defined $employees) { foreach my $employee (@{$employees}) { $employee->company($self); } } };
Again, as with the BUILD
method, we know that the type constraint
check has already happened, so we can just check for defined-ness on the
$employees
argument.
At this point, our Company class is complete. Next comes our Person class and its subclass, the previously mentioned Employee class.
The Person class should be obvious to you at this point. It has a few
required
attributes, and the middle_initial
slot has an additional
predicate
method (which we saw in the previous recipe with the
BinaryTree class).
Next, the Employee class, which should also be pretty obvious at this
point. It requires a title
, and maintains a weakened reference to a
Company instance. The only new item, which we have seen before in
examples, but never in the recipe itself, is the override
method
modifier:
override 'full_name' => sub { my $self = shift; super() . ', ' . $self->title };
This just tells Moose that I am intentionally overriding the superclass
full_name
method here, and adding the value of the title
slot at
the end of the employee's full name.
And that's about it.
Once again, as with all the other recipes, you can go about using these classes like any other Perl 5 class. A more detailed example of usage can be found in t/004_recipe.t.
This recipe was intentionally longer and more complex to illustrate both how easily Moose classes can interact (using class type constraints, etc.) and the sheer density of information and behaviors which Moose can pack into a relatively small amount of typing. Ponder for a moment how much more code a non-Moose plain old Perl 5 version of this recipe would have been (including all the type constraint checks, weak references, and so on).
And of course, this recipe also introduced the subtype
keyword, and
its usefulness within the Moose toolkit. In the next recipe we will
focus more on subtypes, and introduce the idea of type coercion as well.
where
block as well, so it can also be accessed as $_[0]
as well.
BUILD
method is called by Moose::Object::BUILDALL
, which is
called by Moose::Object::new
. BUILDALL
will climb the object
inheritance graph and call the appropriate BUILD
methods in the
correct order.
Stevan Little <stevan@iinteractive.com>
Copyright 2006-2008 by Infinity Interactive, Inc.
This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself.
Moose::Cookbook::Recipe4 - Subtypes, and modeling a simple B<Company> class hierarchy |